Reagan-Appointed Judge Resigns So He Can Attack Trump

Senior U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf Resigns, Citing Threats to Judicial Independence
BOSTON — Senior U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf, appointed to the federal bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1985, has resigned from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts to publicly criticize the Trump administration’s approach to the rule of law.
In an essay published in The Atlantic on November 9, 2025, Wolf stated that judicial ethics rules limiting political commentary had become untenable. The 40-year veteran jurist, who assumed senior status in 2013, described the administration’s actions as an “assault on the rule of law,” alleging it has used the legal system to target political opponents while shielding allies.
Wolf, who began his career at the Justice Department after the Watergate scandal, cited former Attorney General Edward Levi’s model of nonpartisan justice as a guiding influence. “Silence, for me, is now intolerable,” he wrote.
The White House responded sharply. Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson called the criticism from Wolf and like-minded judges reflective of personal agendas rather than impartial jurisprudence. “Judges that want to inject their own personal agenda into the law have no place on the bench,” Jackson said. She noted the administration’s strong record of Supreme Court victories as evidence that its policies are legally sound.
Wolf’s resignation does not create a vacancy for the president to fill, as his seat was already filled when he took senior status.
The move comes amid heightened tensions between the executive branch and segments of the federal judiciary. Supporters view Wolf’s decision as a principled defense of institutional norms, while critics argue it exemplifies judicial activism and further politicization of the courts.
The development occurs as the Republican National Committee heads into the 2026 midterm elections with a substantial fundraising advantage over Democrats, positioning the GOP to defend its narrow congressional majorities aggressively.